In an important decision recently handed down by the Court of Cassation in Dubai, the court reaffirmed the central role of the Dubai judiciary in resolving complex insurance 

disputes.

The ruling, which focuses on jurisdictional matters and the allocation of responsibilities between regional and federal bodies, highlights how jurisdictional boundaries are enforced and interpreted in the UAE’s legal landscape.

This case provides a pivotal example of how courts in Dubai maintain their judicial independence while adhering to the broader regulatory framework governing insurance and dispute resolution.

Overview of the Dispute

The case originated when an individual filed a claim against an insurance company for compensation amounting to AED 300,000, based on both material and moral damages he had suffered due to a road traffic accident in Abu Dhabi.

The claimant sought compensation through the insurance dispute resolution committee established in Dubai under the UAE Central Bank‘s authority.

The decision of the committee, which awarded the claimant AED 130,000, was contested by the insurance company, raising jurisdictional challenges about whether the committee in Dubai had the legal authority to hear the case, given that the accident occurred in Abu Dhabi.

The insurance company argued that the committee in Dubai lacked jurisdiction and that the case should have been heard by the relevant insurance dispute resolution committee in Abu Dhabi, where the accident occurred.

This argument formed the core of the legal battle, which escalated to the Dubai Court of First Instance, the Dubai Court of Appeal, and finally, the Dubai Court of Cassation.

The Key Jurisdictional Issue

At the heart of the dispute was the question of jurisdiction: should the insurance dispute resolution committee in Dubai handle claims arising from accidents that took place in other Emirates, or should such cases be restricted to the committees within the geographical boundaries where the incidents occurred?

Dubai courts have consistently upheld the principle that each Emirate’s judicial system operates independently, except in areas expressly assigned to federal courts.

This autonomy is codified in the UAE Constitution, which grants each Emirate its own judiciary.

The Dubai judiciary, including its various courts and committees, is therefore responsible for handling disputes within the geographical boundaries of Dubai.

However, the dispute resolution committees, particularly those dealing with insurance matters, often exercise broader jurisdiction due to the nature of their creation by federal authority and the nationwide application of insurance policies.

In this case, the committee’s jurisdiction was called into question, and the Dubai Court of First Instance initially ruled that it did not have jurisdiction.

This decision was subsequently overturned by the Court of Appeal, which ruled that the Dubai committee did have the authority to resolve the dispute because the insurance company had its headquarters in Dubai.

The Court of Cassation’s Analysis

When the matter reached the Dubai Court of Cassation, the court meticulously examined the legal framework surrounding jurisdiction.

The court referred to several legal principles, including Article 104 of the UAE Constitution and provisions of the UAE Civil Procedures Law, as well as the Federal Law establishing the UAE Central Bank and its related regulations on insurance dispute committees.

The Court of Cassation upheld the principle that jurisdiction is fundamentally tied to the place where a company is headquartered.

In this instance, the insurance company’s principal place of business was in Dubai, which entitled the claimant to file his dispute with the Dubai Insurance Dispute Resolution Committee.

The court further noted that insurance policies are generally national in scope, and as such, disputes arising from them can be brought before any relevant committee that has jurisdiction over the parties involved, even if the incident occurred outside Dubai.

In its decision, the Court of Cassation emphasized that insurance disputes are distinct from purely local matters, as they often involve broader commercial and legal interests that cross Emirate boundaries.

The court held that limiting the jurisdiction of dispute resolution committees to the geographic location of the incident would undermine the efficiency and purpose of such committees, which were established to streamline the resolution of insurance claims across the UAE.

The Impact of the Decision

The Dubai Court of Cassation’s ruling underscores the importance of jurisdictional clarity in the UAE’s legal system.

It reaffirms that while each Emirate maintains its independent judiciary, there are cases where jurisdiction may extend beyond geographic boundaries due to the nature of the dispute and the entities involved.

In insurance matters, the location of the company’s headquarters plays a decisive role in determining which court or committee has the authority to hear a case.

Additionally, this ruling serves as a reminder that parties to insurance contracts and disputes must carefully consider where they bring their claims.

Insurance companies operating nationwide, especially those headquartered in major commercial hubs like Dubai, can expect to resolve disputes through committees or courts in the Emirate of their principal place of business, regardless of where the underlying incident occurred.

Conclusion

The decision of the Dubai Court of Cassation highlights the complexity and importance of jurisdictional issues in the UAE’s legal framework, particularly in relation to insurance disputes.

It emphasizes the need for parties to understand the implications of their insurance contracts and the role of dispute resolution committees in ensuring fair and efficient outcomes.

The court’s ruling reaffirms the jurisdictional reach of Dubai’s legal system and its ability to handle cases involving nationwide business entities, providing greater clarity and consistency in the resolution of insurance-related conflicts across the UAE.

As the UAE continues to evolve as a global commercial hub, the legal system’s approach to jurisdiction and dispute resolution will remain a key factor in maintaining investor confidence and ensuring that justice is efficiently administered across the nation.

You can benefit from the free consultation for 30-min, and get the help you need from the best lawyers in Dubai, whether you’re in the region or not!