In the intricate world of banking law, the relationship between financial institutions, borrowers, and guarantors is often governed by a delicate balance of contractual obligations and regulatory compliance.
A recent decision from the Abu Dhabi Court of Cassation offers a notable insight into these dynamics, highlighting the importance of understanding the legal principles surrounding bank guarantees and the responsibilities of involved parties.
An Overview on the Case
The case decided on November 19, 2024, involved a financial institution (the appellant) seeking to recover a substantial sum from several defendants in relation to a credit facility agreement and associated guarantees.
The court examined issues arising from the non-fulfilment of obligations under a banking facility agreement, which had been entered into in 2017 between the appellant bank and one of the defendants.
The defendants had been obligated to provide both personal guarantees and general collateral, but a breach of these terms led the bank to pursue the recovery of amounts due.
The dispute centered on a credit facility of AED 105,000,000, with various guarantees provided by the individual defendants.
One key aspect of the case involved a demand for payment of AED 5,541,425, including legal interest.
The bank also sought to enforce payment of guarantees issued to secure the loan.
Read more about: the difference between bank loans and legal mortgages
Legal Proceedings and Challenges
The bank’s claim was initially heard in the Abu Dhabi Court of First Instance, which ruled that the defendants were liable for the outstanding amounts.
However, the defendants contested the ruling, arguing that certain legal provisions, specifically those related to the Central Bank’s regulations on credit facilities, had not been properly considered.
These regulations, introduced by Federal Decree-Law No. 23/2022, require financial institutions to ensure that sufficient collateral is obtained before granting credit facilities.
Despite this, the case proceeded through multiple levels of judicial scrutiny. In the Court of Appeal, the bank’s claim was upheld, but the defendants continued to challenge the ruling.
They argued that the provisions of the newly amended law, particularly those concerning the sufficiency of collateral, had been misapplied.
The final legal battle culminated in a ruling from the Abu Dhabi Court of Cassation, which reviewed the legal arguments concerning the enforceability of guarantees and the application of the Central Bank’s regulatory framework.
Key Legal Issues and Analysis
One of the most significant legal issues addressed in this case was whether the personal guarantees provided by the defendants were adequate under the Central Bank’s regulations.
According to the Central Bank’s guidelines, as detailed in Article 121 of the Federal Decree-Law No. 23/2022, financial institutions are required to obtain sufficient collateral to cover credit facilities.
his includes not only personal guarantees but also tangible assets that can be liquidated in case of default.
The defendants in this case argued that the guarantees provided were not sufficient, citing the absence of separate collateral for the bank guarantees.
The Abu Dhabi Court of Cassation, however, upheld the lower court’s judgment, stating that the bank had acted within its rights in seeking to recover the outstanding amounts.
The court ruled that the guarantees provided, though not exclusive, were valid for the purpose of securing the credit facility.
Importantly, the court reinforced the principle that the role of the court is to assess the sufficiency of evidence presented, including the report from the appointed experts who had evaluated the bank’s claim.
The Role of Expert Testimony
A key aspect of the case was the involvement of expert testimony, which played a significant role in the court’s decision-making process.
The court-appointed experts, comprising banking professionals, were tasked with reviewing the loan agreements, guarantees, and supporting documentation.
Their findings were pivotal in determining whether the bank had complied with the necessary regulatory requirements and whether the guarantees were enforceable.
The court’s reliance on expert testimony demonstrates the crucial role that specialized knowledge plays in financial disputes of this nature.
The Court’s Judgment
On November 19, 2024, the Abu Dhabi Court of Cassation rendered its final judgment, rejecting the appeal and affirming the earlier decisions.
The court ruled that the claim for the outstanding amounts, including interest and legal fees, was valid.
The decision emphasized the importance of adhering to banking regulations, including the sufficiency of collateral, but found that the guarantees in place were legally binding and enforceable in this particular case.
Conclusion: The Implications for Banking and Financial Disputes
This case highlights several critical aspects of banking law, especially in relation to the enforcement of guarantees and the regulatory framework that governs financial transactions in the UAE.
For financial institutions, the case reinforces the importance of ensuring that sufficient and appropriate collateral is obtained when extending credit facilities.
For borrowers and guarantors, the case serves as a reminder of the far-reaching consequences of failing to meet obligations under such agreements.
Moreover, the role of expert testimony underscores the need for accurate and professional evaluation of financial documents in complex cases.
As the UAE continues to refine its banking regulations, particularly in the context of Federal Decree-Law No. 23/2022, this case serves as an important precedent for how the courts interpret and enforce these provisions.
Ultimately, this judgment serves as a crucial reminder for all parties involved in credit agreements—whether they are financial institutions, borrowers, or guarantors—that compliance with the law and the proper execution of agreements is essential to avoid costly legal disputes.
Contact Khairallah Advocates & Legal Consultants and benefit from our free 30-min legal consultation.
*Disclaimer: our blogs, law updates and FAQ’s are freely distributed for educational purposes and to showcase recent updates and regulations in the UAE’s framework.
If you have any questions and need an assistance, contact us at our number or book an appointment online.
