In the realm of UAE judicial processes, an interesting judgment was recently issued by Dubai’s Court of Cassation, which has highlighted essential aspects of arbitration clauses, particularly unilateral arbitration agreements and their compatibility with the UAE legal framework. The ruling, presided over by a distinguished panel of judges, underscores crucial principles for parties considering arbitration as a method for dispute resolution in their commercial agreements.

The case, involving a subcontractor and a main contractor, revolved around claims of unpaid dues for services rendered on various construction projects in Dubai. The subcontractor initiated legal proceedings, seeking a specific monetary amount along with interest, as the main contractor allegedly failed to honor payment obligations despite the subcontractor’s fulfillment of its contractual commitments across several high-profile projects. The court evaluated whether the arbitration clause embedded in the contract barred the court from assuming jurisdiction, as the main contractor insisted on enforcing arbitration per the contractual terms.

The Issue of Unilateral Arbitration Clauses

A notable point of contention in this case was the nature of the arbitration clause, which granted the main contractor the exclusive authority to choose between arbitration and judicial recourse, potentially restricting the subcontractor’s access to the court system. This concept, known as a “unilateral arbitration clause,” raises intricate questions about fairness and equality in dispute resolution, as it allows one party to dictate the forum unilaterally.

The court highlighted that arbitration is a consensual process rooted in mutual agreement, not unilateral imposition. The UAE Arbitration Law, specifically Federal Law No. 6 of 2018, mandates that arbitration agreements must be clear, unequivocal, and in writing, requiring explicit consent from both parties. In this case, the court found that the arbitration clause lacked the necessary bilateral commitment, as it provided only an option rather than an obligation to arbitrate. As such, the clause did not meet the threshold for removing the court’s jurisdiction over the matter.

The UAE Judiciary’s Position on Arbitration Agreements

This ruling reaffirms a consistent stance within the UAE judiciary: for arbitration agreements to be enforceable, they must clearly bind both parties to arbitration as the exclusive dispute resolution method. The court stressed that any ambiguity, particularly one that allows a single party to control the arbitration decision unilaterally, diminishes the enforceability of such clauses.

Furthermore, the judgment emphasized the role of courts in preserving procedural fairness and the right of access to justice. It reinforced that while arbitration is favored for its efficiency and expertise in commercial disputes, it must remain a balanced choice for all parties involved. The ruling concluded that an arbitration clause allowing one party the sole discretion to select arbitration or court proceedings fails to satisfy the requirements of a valid arbitration agreement under UAE law.

Implications for Contract Drafting in the UAE

This judgment serves as a valuable guideline for drafting arbitration clauses in UAE commercial contracts. Companies entering into contracts with UAE entities should ensure that arbitration clauses are mutual and unequivocal. The UAE courts have shown that they will critically assess arbitration provisions to ensure they do not undermine the principles of fairness and equality. Legal advisors and contract drafters are encouraged to craft arbitration clauses that clearly express the intention of both parties, avoiding any phrasing that could be construed as unilateral or discretionary.

Final Remarks: Towards Balanced Dispute Resolution Mechanisms

The case reiterates the UAE’s commitment to upholding equitable dispute resolution mechanisms and provides essential guidance for businesses structuring arbitration clauses in commercial agreements. As the UAE continues to evolve as a global business hub, clarity in contract terms, particularly around arbitration, is paramount. This decision by the Dubai Court of Cassation reflects a judicious approach to arbitration agreements, ensuring that the autonomy of parties to choose arbitration is respected, provided it aligns with principles of mutual consent and procedural equity.

This landmark ruling provides an instructive perspective for local and international companies operating in the UAE, reminding them of the UAE judiciary’s stance on unilateral arbitration and reinforcing the importance of balanced contractual obligations for effective dispute resolution.

Contact Khairallah Advocates & Legal Consultants and benefit from our free 30-min legal consultation.

*Disclaimer: our blogs, law updates and FAQ’s are freely distributed for educational purposes and to showcase recent updates and regulations in the UAE’s framework.

If you have any questions and need assistance, contact us at our number or book an appointment online.