Introduction

On December 30, 2024, the UAE Court of Appeal issued a significant judgment in a case challenging the validity of an arbitration award. This decision underscores the UAE’s commitment to upholding arbitration agreements and reinforces the finality of court decisions in arbitrator appointments. The case provides valuable insights into the interpretation of UAE Federal Law No. 6 of 2018 on Arbitration and the court’s approach to challenges against arbitral awards.

Background of the Case

The dispute arose from an arbitration proceeding between two parties, where the claimant sought to annul an arbitration award dated October 2, 2024. The contested award had ruled that the sole arbitrator lacked jurisdiction to decide the case and ordered the claimant to pay arbitration costs. The claimant’s primary argument for annulment was based on alleged irregularities in the arbitrator’s appointment and jurisdiction.

Key Legal Issues

The Court of Appeal’s judgment addressed several crucial legal points:

1. Validity of Arbitrator Appointment: The court emphasized that the sole arbitrator had been appointed through a previous court order. This order was issued based on an arbitration request and was made in the presence of both parties.

2. Finality of Court Decisions on Arbitrator Appointments: The judgment stressed that the court order appointing the arbitrator had acquired the force of res judicata.  Consequently, challenging the arbitrator’s competence before the arbitral tribunal itself was deemed impermissible.
3. Party Participation and Waiver of Objections: The court noted that the respondent in the arbitration had not objected to the composition of the arbitral tribunal during the proceedings, nor had they proposed an alternative method for tribunal formation before the court that issued the appointment order.

4. Interpretation of UAE Arbitration Law: The judgment referred to Articles 9 and 13 of Federal Law No. 6 of 2018 on Arbitration. These provisions outline the procedures for appointing arbitrators and the consequences of failing to follow agreed-upon selection processes.

Court’s Reasoning and Decision

The Court of Appeal provided a detailed rationale for dismissing the challenge to the arbitration award:

1. Respect for Party Autonomy: The court emphasized the primacy of the parties’ agreement in arbitrator selection, as stipulated in Article 9 of the Arbitration Law.
2. Court’s Role in Arbitrator Appointment: Where parties fail to agree or follow the agreed procedure, Article 13 empowers the court to appoint arbitrators upon request.
3. Binding Nature of Court Appointments: The court held that its previous decision appointing the arbitrator was final and binding, having been made in the presence of both parties without objection.
4. Waiver of Right to Object: The court noted that the respondent’s failure to object to the tribunal’s composition during the arbitration proceedings constituted a waiver of their right to raise this issue later.
5. Scope of Judicial Review: The judgment clarified that the court’s role in reviewing arbitration awards is limited and does not extend to reassessing the merits of the arbitrator’s decision on jurisdiction.

Implications of the Judgment

This ruling has several significant implications for arbitration practice in the UAE:

1. Reinforcement of Arbitration Agreements: The decision underscores the UAE courts’ commitment to upholding arbitration agreements and limiting interference in arbitral proceedings.
2. Importance of Timely Objections: Parties are reminded of the critical need to raise objections to arbitrator appointments or tribunal composition at the earliest opportunity.
3. Finality of Court Decisions: The judgment reinforces the binding nature of court decisions on arbitrator appointments, discouraging subsequent challenges on these grounds.
4. Narrow Scope of Judicial Review: The court’s approach demonstrates a restrained interpretation of its power to review arbitral awards, focusing on procedural aspects rather than substantive decisions.

Conclusion

This judgment by the UAE Court of Appeal on December 30, 2024, stands as a significant affirmation of the country’s pro-arbitration stance. It provides clarity on the appointment of arbitrators, the finality of court decisions in this regard, and the limited grounds for challenging arbitral awards. The decision serves as a valuable precedent, offering guidance to legal practitioners, arbitrators, and parties engaged in arbitration proceedings in the UAE. It reinforces the UAE’s position as a favorable jurisdiction for international arbitration, emphasizing respect for party autonomy and the finality of arbitral processes.

Having said that, Contact Khairallah Advocates & Legal Consultants and benefit from our free 30-min legal consultation.

*Disclaimer: our blogs, law updates and FAQ’s are freely distributed for educational purposes and to showcase recent updates and regulations in the UAE’s framework.

If you have any questions and need assistance, contact us at our number or book an appointment online.