In a landmark ruling delivered by the Court of Cassation in May 2024, the legal principles surrounding the separate legal entity status of companies and their branches in the UAE were rigorously tested.

This case highlights critical issues related to corporate responsibility, the separation of legal personalities between parent companies and their branches, and the conditions under which financial obligations can be extended to branches.

Background of the Case

At the heart of this legal dispute was a construction company, which faced enforcement of a substantial financial judgment against one of its branches in the UAE.

The branch had accumulated debt that reached a significant amount, which the creditor sought to recover through execution proceedings initiated in 2022.

The company, organized as a limited liability company (LLC), was argued to have distinct legal and financial responsibilities separate from its branch.

The creditor, represented by a legal team, requested that the enforcement procedures include not only the branch but also the parent company, urging the court to treat both entities as a single economic unit for the purposes of debt recovery.

The creditor’s rationale was based on the fact that the branch operated under the same corporate umbrella and shared assets and liabilities with the parent company.

The Legal Issue: Separate Legal Personality

The crux of the case revolved around whether a branch of a company should be treated as a separate legal entity from its parent company, or whether the branch’s liabilities could be extended to the parent company.

The UAE, like many jurisdictions, operates under the principle that a company is a separate legal entity from its shareholders and other affiliates, including its branches.

This legal doctrine, rooted in corporate law, establishes that the liabilities of one entity (such as a branch) do not automatically extend to another (such as the parent company) unless specific legal grounds exist to “pierce the corporate veil” and hold them accountable jointly.

In this case, the court of first instance and the court of appeal both upheld this principle, ruling that the branch and the parent company had distinct financial responsibilities.

The branch’s debts were considered separate from the parent company’s assets and liabilities.

The creditor, however, was unsatisfied with these rulings and escalated the matter to the Court of Cassation, arguing that the branch could not function independently from the parent company.

The Court of Cassation’s Ruling

In a decision that will have far-reaching implications for businesses operating in the UAE, the Court of Cassation overturned the lower courts’ decisions.

It ruled that, in this instance, the parent company could indeed be held responsible for the debts of its branch, reasoning that the branch lacked an independent legal personality.

The court highlighted that while LLCs typically enjoy the protection of limited liability, allowing branches to operate independently in legal matters, this does not apply universally.

If a branch is financially dependent on the parent company, operates without its own assets, and serves primarily as an extension of the parent company’s operations, it may not be shielded from the liabilities incurred by the branch. The court based its ruling on the notion that the two entities were, for all practical purposes, a single economic unit.

Legal Implications for Companies in the UAE

This ruling reinforces a vital lesson for companies operating in the UAE: while the corporate structure provides significant protection, the separation between parent companies and their branches is not absolute.

Companies must be mindful of how they structure their operations, especially when it comes to the financial and operational independence of their branches.

For businesses, this case underscores the importance of:

1. Ensuring Clear Separation: Companies should ensure that their subsidiaries are sufficiently independent, both financially and operationally, from the parent company. This includes maintaining separate bank accounts, independent accounting records, and distinct management structures.

2. Monitoring Financial Risks: Companies should closely monitor the financial risks associated with their branches and subsidiaries. In cases where branches are not financially independent, there may be a risk that the parent company could be held liable for the branch’s debts.

3. Complying with Corporate Governance: Maintaining robust corporate governance policies that define the scope of liability between parent companies and their branches is essential. Failure to do so could expose the parent company to unforeseen liabilities, as demonstrated in this case.

Conclusion

This ruling serves as a reminder that the UAE legal system takes a pragmatic approach to corporate accountability, particularly in cases where financial interdependence between entities can blur the lines of legal separation.

It is crucial for companies to understand the legal frameworks governing their corporate structures and take steps to protect their assets and operations accordingly.

In the evolving landscape of corporate law in the UAE, businesses must stay vigilant and ensure that their practices align with the legal requirements to avoid unexpected liabilities.

This decision by the Court of Cassation is a clear indication that, while the law may generally protect corporate entities, there are exceptions where the courts will hold companies accountable beyond the traditional limits of liability.

We at Khairallah advocates & legal consultants, can help your corporate at each and every legal matter, whether it is disputes, taxation, formation and a lot more. We offer a 30-min free legal consultation for everyone. Contact us today and let us handle the rest