Specialized Legal Services

9

Information Technology

9

Investigation

9

Maritime

9

Medical Negligence

SUBMIT YOUR TICKET TODAY!

Services

9

Corporate and Commercial Law

9

Banking & Finance

9

Litigation and Dispute Resolution

Family

9

Marriage, Divorce & Child Custody

9

Inheritance & Wills

Property & Real Estate

9

Buy & Sell

9

Service Charge Claims

9

Rent Dispute & Contract Terminate and invalidate SPA.

SUBSCRIBE

8

Introduction

In a recent judgment delivered by the Court of Cassation on October 28, 2024, the court dealt with an important matter regarding the recognition and enforcement of bankruptcy orders issued by foreign courts. 

The case at hand involved a request for the recognition of a bankruptcy procedure that had been initiated abroad, and the subsequent enforcement of such an order within the UAE. 

The court addressed key legal issues relating to the enforcement of foreign judgments, particularly in the context of insolvency procedures.

 

Case Overview

The case revolved around an appeal concerning the refusal to enforce a bankruptcy order issued by a foreign court. 

The appellant, a creditor in the bankruptcy proceedings, had petitioned for the recognition and execution of a foreign court’s order that involved opening bankruptcy and liquidation procedures for the debtor. 

The appellant sought to have the foreign bankruptcy order enforced in the UAE, arguing that the order should be recognized and acted upon under the UAE’s legal framework for cross-border enforcement of judgments

The foreign bankruptcy order had been issued in relation to two parties, which involved the liquidation of assets, the appointment of an administrator, and the establishment of creditor rights. 

The appellant’s plea was based on the assertion that there were assets within the UAE that could be liquidated under the foreign bankruptcy procedure, and creditors in the UAE should be able to pursue their claims through the appointed administrator.

 

Key Legal Issues

The primary legal issue addressed by the court was whether the UAE courts would recognize and enforce a foreign bankruptcy order. 

This issue brought into focus several aspects of international cooperation in the enforcement of judicial orders, particularly in insolvency matters. 

The appellant argued that the agreement between the GCC countries for the mutual recognition and enforcement of judicial decisions should apply to bankruptcy orders as well, as no explicit exception had been made in the relevant legal instruments.

At the heart of the case was the appellant’s contention that the refusal to execute the foreign bankruptcy order violated both the spirit and the letter of existing agreements between the UAE and other GCC states regarding judicial cooperation. 

The appellant cited the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) agreements on mutual recognition and enforcement of judgments, particularly focusing on the provisions related to the recognition of foreign bankruptcy proceedings.

 

Court’s Analysis

The Court of Cassation analyzed the matter thoroughly, drawing on provisions of both UAE law and the relevant international conventions. 

One of the key legal texts referred to was Federal Law No. 53 of 1999 concerning the recognition and enforcement of judgments within the GCC states

The court emphasized that while the law generally permits the enforcement of foreign judgments, there are specific conditions and limitations that apply, especially when dealing with complex matters like insolvency and bankruptcy.

The court highlighted the principle of reciprocity as a key factor in determining whether to enforce foreign judgments. 

According to UAE law, for a foreign judgment to be recognized, it must not contradict the public policy of the UAE. 

In this case, the court considered whether enforcing a foreign bankruptcy order would be consistent with the UAE’s legal and economic policies, particularly the protections afforded to local creditors.

The court also noted that while the GCC agreements allow for the recognition of foreign judgments, they do not explicitly address the enforcement of bankruptcy decisions. 

This legal gap was central to the court’s ruling. The court reasoned that the agreements between GCC states, while broad, were not intended to cover all matters equally and that specific treaties or bilateral agreements would need to be invoked for bankruptcy cases. 

This limitation led the court to decide that the foreign bankruptcy order could not be enforced in the UAE under the current legal framework.

 

The Court’s Decision

Ultimately, the Court of Cassation upheld the decision of the lower courts, affirming the refusal to enforce the foreign bankruptcy order. 

The court stated that the foreign judgment did not meet the necessary criteria for enforcement under UAE law. 

Specifically, the court found that the relevant GCC agreements, while comprehensive in nature, did not extend to the specific enforcement of bankruptcy orders, particularly those involving the liquidation of assets within the UAE.

The court also acknowledged the complexities of international insolvency law and the need for a more tailored approach to enforce bankruptcy orders in a manner that aligns with both domestic and international legal standards. 

The ruling underscored the necessity for clear, explicit legal frameworks to address cross-border insolvency and the protection of creditors’ rights.

 

Conclusion

This judgment serves as an important reminder of the complexities involved in enforcing foreign bankruptcy orders within the UAE. 

It highlights the challenges faced by creditors seeking to enforce judgments across borders, especially in the context of insolvency procedures. 

The court’s decision also underscores the importance of international treaties and agreements in shaping the enforcement of foreign judgments, while also pointing to the limitations of such frameworks when it comes to specialized matters like bankruptcy.

In light of this ruling, it is clear that businesses and creditors operating in the UAE must be aware of the specific legal requirements and international agreements that govern the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments, particularly those related to insolvency. 

This case also serves as a call for more clarity and reform in the field of cross-border bankruptcy enforcement to ensure that creditors are able to effectively pursue their claims within the UAE, even in the face of foreign proceedings.

Contact Khairallah Advocates & Legal Consultants and benefit from our free 30-min legal consultation.

*Disclaimer: our blogs, law updates and FAQ’s are freely distributed for educational purposes and to showcase recent updates and regulations in the UAE’s framework.

If you have any questions and need an assistance, contact us at our number or book an appointment online.

jouslin khairallah

khairallah advocates